Centro de Documentação da PJ | ||||
| SAMUELS, Julie E., e outros Collecting DNA at arrest [Documento electrónico] : policies, practices, and implications : final technical report / Julie E. Samuels, Elizabeth H. Davies, Dwight B. Pope.- [Washington, D.C.] : The Urban Institute. Justice Policy Center, 2013.- 1 CD-ROM ; 12 cm A research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice, Award No. 2009-DN-BX-0004. Ficheiro de 2,99 MB em formato PDF (126 p.). Disponível também em: https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/242812.pdf. Acedido a 04 de Outubro de 2013. RECOLHA DA PROVA, ADN, DETIDO, POLÍCIA CIENTÍFICA, METODOLOGIAS, ESTADOS UNIDOS Introduction. 1. Background: review of the relevant literature and case law. CODIS Overview. Growth of CODIS. Measuring the value of expansion. Specific value of additional arrestee profiles. Considerations of fairness and legality. Views of the Courts. Section highlights. 2. Research design and methods. Legislative review. Case Law Review. Interviews with Federal and State Laboratory representatives. Data analysis. State Profiles. 3. Arrestee DNA laws and their provisions. Scope and timing of collection and analysis. Case Status. Qualifying offenses. Offender characteristics. Expungement procedures. Responsibility for expungement. Additional conditions. Guidelines for proper notification, processing times, and use of profiles. Oversight and accountability. Collection specifics. Arrestee refusals and collection mistakes. Tracking requirements. Section highlights. 4. Implementation of arrestee DNA laws. Preparation activities. Changing laboratory processes, facilities, equipment, and technology. Hiring and training new staff. Training new collecting agents. Ongoing activities. Collecting and analyzing additional samples. Checking for duplicates. Monitoring case status. Ensuring proper collection and submission of materials. Section highlights. 5. The effect of arrestee DNA laws on public safety. Assumption 1: Arrestee laws increase the number of unique offender profiles in CODIS. Assumption 2: Arrestee laws increase the number of hits and investigations aided. Assumption 3: Arrestee laws may solve cases faster. Section highlights. 6. State and Federal profiles. Colorado. Kansas. Louisiana. Maryland. North Carolina. Federal Government. 7. Findings and policy implications. More than half the states and the federal government have passed laws authorizing arrestee DNA collection. Laboratories assumed responsibility for implementing arrestee laws and often responded in creative and innovative ways. Collecting DNA at arrest increases the number of profiles in DNA databases. Arrestee DNA laws increase hits to forensic profiles, but to an unknown degree. Safeguards and compliance monitoring represent important aspects of implementation. Looking ahead to the future of arrestee DNA laws. |