Centro de Documentação da PJ
Monografia
 CD59 |
European constitutionalism and the European Arrest Warrant [Documento electrónico] : contrapunctual principles in disharmony / Jan Komárek.- New York : New York University School of Law, 2005.- 1 CD-ROM ; 12 cm. - (Jean Monnet Working Paper ; 10)
The Jean Monnet Program. Ficheiro de 301 Kb em formato pdf (29 p.). Disponível também em: http://www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/papers/05/051001.pdf
Acedido em 19 de Abril de 2007.
ISBN ISSN 1087-2221
MANDADO DE DETENÇÃO EUROPEU, CONSTITUIÇÃO EUROPEIA, TRIBUNAL CONSTITUCIONAL, JURISPRUDÊNCIA, DIREITO COMUNITÁRIO, DIREITO COMPARADO, POLÓNIA, ALEMANHA
I Introduction – national constitutional courts and their perspectives on the european constitutional order. II The EAW framework decision and the problem of extraditing own nationals. III The EAW framework decision and the polish constitutional tribunal: taking european commitments seriously?: A - surrender as a subset of extradition. B - Temporal limitation of the decision’s effects as a case of balancing competing principles. IV Federal constitutional court’s reservations to the mutual trust between the member states: A - The purpose of protecting german nationals from extraditing in the view of the FCC – rights stemming from the citizenship. B - FCC’s distrust to other member states’ criminal justice systems. V Contrapunctual law principles and the area of freedom, security and justice: A - The decisions in the light of principles of contrapunctual law. a) Pluralism, consistency and coherence, universalisability. b) Limits of contrapunctual law. c) Last principle: institutional choice as a way out? B - Contrapunctual law principles and the area of freedom, security and
justice. VI Conclusion.