Analítico de Periódico
YORK, Neil L.
Natural rights dissected and rejected : John Lind's counter to the Declaration of Independence / Neil L. York
Law and History Review, v.35 n.3 (August 2017), p.563-593
HISTÓRIA DO DIREITO / EUA
James Oliver Robertson intended no sacrilege when he called the Declaration of Independence a sacred text, an essential component of what has become American “holy writ.” It is now venerated as a founding document of the national civil religion. The Declaration, Robertson emphasized, reflects an expectation that the new United States would become the nation among all nations. As celebrated now, independence then provided the political means to achieve a social end, that social end being a better life for Americans, their new nation acting as an exemplar for the larger world. Or, as Stephen E. Lucas put it, the Declaration of Independence went through an “apotheosis,” through which, over the years, Americans have come to “see its original purpose in universal terms almost wholly divorced from the events of 1776.”